LANTHANIDES

Comparisons and Contrasts

Yttrium - Why consider it with the Lanthanides?

Scandium too?

6 Reasons why Scandium could be considered with the Lanthanides

1. Sc occurs effectively exclusively in +3 oxidation state

combines with non-metals Æ ScHal3 Sc2O3, etc...
but coordination octahedral (small size)

2. Sc forms reduced halides e.g. Sc7Cl12 which is Sc3+(Sc6Cl12)3- with Sc6 clusters (but c.f. Nb)

3. Scandium Hydride ScH2 is highly conducting Sc3+(H-)2(e-)

4. Forms complexes of high coordination number with chelating O-donors

e.g. Na+[Sc(CF3COCHCOCF3)4-] with C.N. = 8
but forms octahedral complexes with monodentate ligands e.g. mer-ScCl3(thf)3

5. Nitrate & Sulphate are obtained as hydrated salts Sc(NO3)3•4H2O & Sc2(SO4)3•5H2O

6. Typical organometallics include: Sc(C5H5)3 (polymeric in the solid state)

dimeric Sc(C5H5)2Cl, monomeric form is a thf adduct

 

6 Reasons why Scandium could be considered as main group IIIA

1. Sc3+ (r = 74 pm) is appreciably smaller than any of the rare earths

Þ behaviour intermediate between the Lanthanides & Aluminium

2. Sc2O3 is more like Al2O3 than Ln2O3: amphoteric Æ Sc(OH)63- in excess OH-

3. ScF3 disssolves in excess F- Æ ScF63- (N.B. scarcity of halogeno complexes for Lanthanides)

4. Anhydrous ScCl3 is easily obtained by P2O5-dehydration of hydrated halide

but unlike AlCl3, ScCl3 is not a Friedel-Crafts catalyst

 

Scandium may with similarly few exceptions be viewed as a 1st Row Transition Metal

 

Some CONTRASTS between Lanthanides & Pre-Transition & Transition Metals

Pre-Transition Metals
Lanthanides
Transition Metals
Essentially Monovalent

- show Group (n+) oxidation state

Essentially Monovalent (+3)

+2/+4 for certain configurations

Show Variable Valence

(extensive redox chemistry)

control by environment ~ ligands, pH etc…

Periodic trends

- dominated by (effective nuclear) charge

at noble gas config.

(i.e. on group valence)

Lanthanide Contraction of Ln3+
Size changes of Mn+ less marked
Similar Properties for a given group

(differentiated by size)

Similar Properties

(differentiated by size)

Substantial Gradation in Properties
widespread on earth
common mineralogy
diverse mineralogy
No Ligand Field Effects
Insignificant Ligand Field Effects
Substantial Ligand Field Effects
Always 'hard' (O, Hal, N donors)

(preferably negatively charged)

Always 'hard' (O, Hal, N donors)

(preferably negatively charged)

Later (increasingly from Fe&endash;Cu)/heavier metals

may show a 'soft' side

'Ionic' Æ 'Covalent' Organometallics
'Ionic' Organometallics
'Covalent' Organometallics
No ¹-Ligand Effects
Paucity of ¹-Ligand Effects
¹-Acceptor Ligands Æ Extensive Chemistry
Poor Coordination Properties

(C.N. determined by size)

High Coordination Numbers

(C.N. determined by size)

Extensive Coordination

C.N. = 6 is typical maximum

(but many exceptions)

Flexibility in Geometry
Flexibility in Geometry
Fixed (by Ligand Field effects) Geometries
No Magnetism from the metal ions

- noble gas configurations of ions

Free Ion-like Magnetism

ground state magnetism

Orbital Magnetism 'Quenched' by Ligand Fields

excited J-states populated

'Ionic' compound formulations

Þ large HOMO-LUMO gaps

Þ UV CT spectra

Weak, Narrow Optical Spectra

forbidden, unfacilitated transitions

Stronger, Broader Optical Spectra

forbidden transitions vibronically-assisted




If you have any comments please contact stephen.heyes@chem.ox.ac.uk 

Main Introduction I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 Lanthanides L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15

Actinides A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 General Data1 Data2 Problems Help

To the Oxford Chemistry IT Centre Homepage


© S.J. Heyes, Oxford, 1997-8